Comparison of Similar Products

This table is not compatible on mobile at this time.


Daily Usage
Minimum length  usage
Portable while using?
2001: This original breast expansion device was invented around this time. The results were often not long lasting without additional surgical augmentation, to the disappointment of users. However, it was the first of its kind. It is not unusual for new technologies to take time to mature
10 hours
3-5 weeks
Discontinued in 2017.
Appears to be $2500, but it has been listed on eBay for close to $5000, probably due to the rarity,
Original Brava Paper
2011: EVERA, from Korea, is created. It is made by a different company than the original Brava.
8 hours
3 months
May be available through medical practices in certain countries, however it is superseded by EVE RHEA, which is now the recommended product by the creators.
The same as EVE RHEA.
EVERA and Brava (AESTES) Evaluation

See Figures 6 and 7 for patient images. See Table 3  at 12 weeks and 16 weeks for volume increase.
From the creators of the original Brava. It is unclear how it has changed from the original or the reason for the similar name with the Korean device.
10 hours
10 weeks
May be available through medical practices in the US.
See the paper linked in above row under AESTES results. This study states that the results of both devices are similar.
2018: EVE RHEA is created. It works faster than EVERA with the same results. It is sold under the name BEbra in Japan.
1 hour for the same results as EVERA
3 months
Available here!
See current price
No, this device is larger and more powerful than its precursor. Device must be stationary while using.
Seoul National University report

(Can be translated with Google translate. )

See EVERA paper in row 2 for similar results images.